I was skeptical about the film simply because having been a fan of the
original. I was doubtful whether the new film will stand up to the first
film. Blade Runner may have shaped the
future, but it’s easy to forget its past. The film is now universally accepted
as a classic, Ridley Scott’s future-noir fantasy from 1982, widely dismissed in
the beginning as an exercise in spectacular emptiness. It was only when Blade
Runner was reconfigured via a 1992 Director’s Cut, and later Scott’s definitive
Final Cut, that its masterpiece status was assured, compared to Fritz Lang’s
Metropolis and Kubrick’s 2001. Architecturally, the production designs evoke
Robert Wiene’s The Cabinet of Dr Caligari, all angular lines and expressionist
shadows.
This is the context for Blade Runner 2049, it was a tough act to
follow, Ridley Scott’s original. Director Denis Villeneuve’s audacious sequel
is really as good as the hype suggests, spectacular enough to win over new
generations of viewers, yet deep enough to reassure diehard fans that their
cherished memories haven’t been forgotten and betrayed. Villeneuve teases away
at the enigmatic identity riddle at the centre of Scott’s movie, brilliantly
sustaining the mystery of a blade runner’s true nature.
No comments:
Post a Comment